Skip to main content

When Will They Figure it Out?

An interesting article appeared today on the Fox News website titled, "What's the Matter With Utah?" by Chad Pergram. (http://congress.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/05/10/whats-the-matter-with-utah/comment-page-3/?action=late-new&order) His column was written in response to this weekend's ousting of Sen. Bob Bennett at the GOP convention in Utah. The four-term senator didn't even make it to the state primary. Pergram's stance is not against Utah, as the title makes it sound, but it is a gross misunderstanding of what is going on at the local level. When are the pols and pundits going to figure it out?

I have nothing personally against Bob Bennett. He's seems like a really good man. But he has been in Washington too long and has gone squishy like too many others. His Democrat friend inadvertently summed up the exact reasons he has been fired by Utah. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) said, "The Congress cannot and will not function properly if legislators are no longer allowed to govern responsibly and independently, while also advocating their party's principles." I, and many others like me, am tired of politicians we hire to represent us in Washington, who then become "independent". By definition, elected officials are supposed to be representatives--but not of their own interests or even of their party. They are supposed to represent their constituents. When they stop doing that, they need to be fired by their employer, the people. Bennett has become too invested personally in the Washington DC scene and has become more interested in his popularity there, than his popularity in Utah. Well, the boss just fired him for breach of contract.

Wyden further said, "Sen. Bennett is not only among the brightest, most consistent and most decent members of the Senate I have ever known, he is also a very conservative man in ever way." All of those things may be true, but that is apparently not enough for the people of Utah, arguably the most conservative state in the union. Until politicians generally, and conservatives in particular, figure out that popularity in the wrong place will be their downfall, they will continue to be surprised this year by election results. At least I hope so.

Washington DC is not a conservative town. In fact, it's largely a town that it is completely out of touch with the reality that is America. It is a petrie dish of politicians, media members, pundits, power seekers and lobbyists. The most savvy of operators know how to grease the skids and work the system there. No conservative, who is true to principles should ever be popular in that crowd. Unfortunately, far too many of them seem to go to Washington and get seduced by the lure of popularity from the wrong crowd, while becoming unpopular with the people who sent them there. In fact, conservatives would be wise to use DC popularity as their litmus test for job performance. If they're becoming popular in Washington, they have most likely lost their way.

Further proof that politicians are out of touch was offered by the bitter Chris Cannon, a multiple term Republican who was ousted from the House in the 2008 election. He got fat, happy and lazy in his role and was also fired by Utahns. His explanation for the voters' actions follows: "You have extreme ideologues who took control of the party and drove normal people out. It's a problem that we have to correct. They (extreme ideologues) learn to hate people who are in government, not understand how it works. It is very clear there is a mass movement in America. They are ignorant. But zealous in what they are doing." In case I had any remaining questions as to why you got your beatdown in 2008 Chris, that completely clears it up. The arrogance of politicians repeats itself over and over. "Extreme ideologues" drove out "normal people"? Or could it be that we expect our elected officials to stand by the principles they professed while running for office? And trust me, my hatred of our current "government" is based in anything but ignorance. The more I read and study, the more "zealous" I become about returning to the form of government established by the Founding Fathers. This sloppy, bloated form of legal bribery we call government is anything but the representative government intended by the founders. So Chris, you keep on believing that rhetoric; it may help you sleep at night, but you're still out. Furthermore, you, Bennett and your ilk will stay out until you figure it out. At least, therein lies my hope for our future. If this scenario is repeated in election after election this year, we just might survive as a nation. My work and my prayers will be to that end.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Flawed Arguments and Stubborn Facts

My last post addressed some of the things we can do to improve health care without government involvement. I got a few comments, but wanted to address a couple in particular. These comments brought up issues that are worthy of response. One of the comments is as follows: " I would like to direct your attention to the writers first stated premise - there is no trust in the government with one sixth of our economy. My question is, how did it become one sixth of the economy? With every step of a 'free' enterprise system being everything but free, freedom is placed upon the back of those who are a dwindling base of contributors to support the greediness of astronomical proportions and the government is the recipient of easy target fingerpointing. If we insist on blaming government for a sick system, we are trying to fix the wrong problems." My initial reply was the following: "There are many causes of the problems in medical care which I have also written about on m...

So What Can We Do?

I have spent a lot of time picking apart the liberal plan for reforming health care in the U.S. I do not have any confidence in a government that cannot run anything cheaply or efficiently. They are the last people I would trust to manage one sixth of our economy--I wouldn't trust them to do my lawn care. So, it's high time to talk about what can and should be done instead. Here are some ideas that would go a long way to lowering the cost of health care for everyone without a government takeover of health care. 1) Individual responsibility: As with anything in life, when we are directly responsible for the outcomes of our decisions, we are better for it, individually and as a society. That responsibility includes being accountable for our life choices, the amount of risks we take and paying our bills. It seems like a no-brainer doesn't it? Unfortunately, we have gotten away from that thinking in reference to our health care. If I choose to have multiple sexual partners, why...

No Such Thing as a Free Ride

There are two maxims that have held true for time in memoriam, "Nothing in life is free" and "You get what you pay for". Nowhere are these two principles more true than when it comes to health care. Politicians are selling "free" health care to the American people, knowing that the word "free" will tickle our ears. It sounds SO good. But in real life, medical care is expensive. It won't stop being expensive just because the government mandates it to be so. "So let it be written, so let it be done." (From the Ten Commandments--ask Pharoah how that worked out for him.) Let's delve into these two ideas. Nothing in life is free: I touched on this in my last post, but there are lots of people that get "free" health care in American right now. (Just because I'm bringing this up doesn't mean that I'm necessarily against it, but we have to deal in realities here.) The government has mandated that all patients that ...