Skip to main content

Mr. Obama's Speech

I listened to the President's speech last night with a somewhat skeptical ear. But I tried to keep an open mind. He was obviously passionate and visibly irritated with those who disagree with him, but he said some good things. I am concerned however, that it is just a bunch of words. People love to have their "ears tickled" with what they want to hear and politicians are master ear-ticklers. I am withholding judgment until I see any actual legislation that includes the things he promised last night.

You see, he kept talking about, "my plan", but he hasn't written a bill. He has left that job to the House and Senate. That's fine--that's their job. But I have read the House version of the bill and the promises he made last night are simply not contained in it. If those promises are to be met, a new bill must be authored because the current House version of the bill is totally irreconcilable with the President's speech. For example:

1) Illegal aliens won't be treated. There is a vague provision in the bill about this, but Obama has said that he wants to grant the illegal aliens citizenship. So technically, they will be citizens, but will they be contributing any more to our economy then than they are now?

2) Abortion will not be paid for by federal dollars. It is not specifically prohibited in the bill--it is not addressed at all. Are we simply to trust his word alone, his solemn promise, that it will not happen? Forgive me if I don't trust government to act upon his word alone.

3) An insurance co-op will be created instead of a public option. There is no mention (that I can remember, at least) of said co-op in the house bill. Instead, pages and pages of the bill empower the government to have the final say on what will be insured, what will be treated and how much will be paid. That is not a co-op--it is government health care. It does not matter what you call it, if the verbiage of the bill is not changed, you have simply re-labeled it.

4) You will be forced to have minimum health coverage. How is this to be enforced? Are health care providers to become the health insurance police? In the current bill it will be enforced by the IRS, through fines and intra-government information sharing. What is the plan Mr. Obama? What are the details? You are long on rhetoric and short on details. I will read the next bill that comes out and then I will make my final judgment.

I don't disagree that we need to make some reforms in our medical system, but I have grave concerns about the government's ability to fix anything. They have bankrupted Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid, we are running a ridiculous deficit and frankly they are a bunch of self-serving idiots. If they do not scrap the existing bill in the House, it will be the largest power-grab, the grossest over-reaching of government authority in the history of this country. The private sector needs to step up and make the necessary fixes on their own, this is not the government's place.

Stay tuned....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

So What Can We Do?

I have spent a lot of time picking apart the liberal plan for reforming health care in the U.S. I do not have any confidence in a government that cannot run anything cheaply or efficiently. They are the last people I would trust to manage one sixth of our economy--I wouldn't trust them to do my lawn care. So, it's high time to talk about what can and should be done instead. Here are some ideas that would go a long way to lowering the cost of health care for everyone without a government takeover of health care. 1) Individual responsibility: As with anything in life, when we are directly responsible for the outcomes of our decisions, we are better for it, individually and as a society. That responsibility includes being accountable for our life choices, the amount of risks we take and paying our bills. It seems like a no-brainer doesn't it? Unfortunately, we have gotten away from that thinking in reference to our health care. If I choose to have multiple sexual partners, why

Flawed Arguments and Stubborn Facts

My last post addressed some of the things we can do to improve health care without government involvement. I got a few comments, but wanted to address a couple in particular. These comments brought up issues that are worthy of response. One of the comments is as follows: " I would like to direct your attention to the writers first stated premise - there is no trust in the government with one sixth of our economy. My question is, how did it become one sixth of the economy? With every step of a 'free' enterprise system being everything but free, freedom is placed upon the back of those who are a dwindling base of contributors to support the greediness of astronomical proportions and the government is the recipient of easy target fingerpointing. If we insist on blaming government for a sick system, we are trying to fix the wrong problems." My initial reply was the following: "There are many causes of the problems in medical care which I have also written about on m

National Lack of Integrity

According to dictionary.com the definition of integrity is: "adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty". Integrity in politics is becoming more scarce than ice cubes in hell. For example, a Huffington Post blog on why people really hate Hillary, was recently shared on Facebook. This blog post was one of the most egregious examples I have ever seen of felony intellectual fraud. The sum and substance of this blog excused everything St. Hillary the Martyr has ever done, or been accused of, because Trump is SO much worse. It then concluded that the real reason people hate her is because she's a woman. I'm not sure if I was more disturbed by the violent dry-heaving caused by this tripe or the fact that someone who I respect, who is smart and accomplished actually believes and shared it. If ever there were a more glaring example of the systemic loss of national integrity in the United States, it is the Presidential Election of 2016.