Skip to main content

Vaccine Hysteria

Nearly unquantifiable amounts of emotional angst have been expended over the last couple of weeks as the Disneyland measles outbreak continues to spread. Passions on both sides have been raging as people point the finger of blame and panic a little. I am not sure how this became such a vitriolic issue. I feel certain that were you to talk to anyone from the Greatest Generation, and ask them their opinion of vaccines, they would express nothing but extreme gratitutide for the amazing scientific advances that could protect their children, family and friends from such horrific illnesses as smallpox, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, whooping cough, etc. My mother is a child of the Greatest Generation, but still remembers an elementary school classmate who contracted polio and was left crippled for life. It really wasn't that long ago that the ravages of those diseases were an ever-present concern in America.

Fast forward to the current day and we find all kinds of theories, rumors, opinions and emotion that is largely spread on the internet. The internet is, of course, another modern wonder that didn't exist during those years. It is a great thing. The downside to the internet is that it can spread rumors and lies that are accepted as fact simply because it was found on the internet. No fact-checking watchdog exists for internet posts (nor should it), but that is sometimes forgotten in our desire to justify our opinions. For example, Louis Farrakhan believes that "bio-weapons such as Ebola and AIDS...are race targeting weapons" created by our government to thin the black population. It is on the internet so it must be true. Right? Many think that vaccinations are some great government conspiracy that includes the entirety of government and the medical profession for some nebulous nefarious purpose to harm American people and the world at large. The history of the creation of vaccinations simply does not jive with that theory.

Edward Jenner, English physician and scientist is the man who is credited with the discovery of vaccination when he made the connection between cowpox and smallpox. His medical breakthrough changed the face of medicine forever. A Christian man, he felt he had been an instrument in God's hands. "I am not surprised that men are not grateful to me; but I wonder that they are not grateful to God for the good which he has made me the instrument of conveying to my fellow creatures." Vaccines were not created by governments, they were developed by inspired men and women of science who were driven to provide a solution for which the world was clamoring. Too many parents were burying too many children or watching the crippling aftermath from diseases that people of my generation know little or nothing about. As I wrote last week, "What we obtain to cheap, we esteem too lightly."

A rising anti-vaccination movement in this country has been sparked by various schools of thought: the homeopaths, anti-government paranoia, natural/whole foods acolytes, and the-afraid-of-the-rise-of allergies, ADD and autism group. One "study" in particular is that which connected vaccines to autism. It has since been totally debunked and exposed as fraudulent. But many have hung on to that idea in spite of the facts. "Rob Ring, chief science officer of Autism Speaks, realeased a statement today (2/5/15) stressing that vaccines do not cause autism, and parents should vaccinate. 'Over the last two decades, extensive research has asked whether there is any link between childhood vaccinations and autism. The results of this research are clear: Vaccines do not cause autism. We urge that all children be fully vaccinated.'" (http://abcnews.go.com/Health/autism-speaks-urges-parents-vaccinate-children/story?id=28751485)

It would be wise for us to take a collective deep breath and step back from the emotion and hysteria about vaccines. The fact is that the vaccines mentioned above have a proven track record of being safe and effective. In fact, so effective, that the CDC declared in 2000 that measles had been eradicated in the United States. We as a nation have enjoyed a relatively disease-free society as those who chose not to immunize have been protected by the "herd immunity" provided by those who have immunized. However, as we now live in a nation where laws are only a matter of political expediency and preference, our country has been inundated under a flow of illegal immigrants. Plenty of problems have come about as a result of our government's failure to enforce our immigration laws, but one of the lesser-known is the introduction of disease by those who have not been immunized. When you immigrate legally to this country you are required to show proof of immunization or be immunized before you enter. Our government has invited this problem. Facts can be tricky things sometimes, but the simple fact about immunization is this: if you are not immunized you are at risk and put others at risk.

This administration will lose no opportunity to force people to act against their will (if they are citizens) and use this "health crisis" to take away our ability to choose whether we vaccinate or not. That is wrong. However, if we make the choice not to vaccinate, we must be prepard to suffer the full consequences of that decision. What if employers start refusing to employ those who have no proof of vaccination? Are they within their rights as employers to protect their employees and customers? What of those who are immuno-compromised through cancer treatment? Are you prepared to watch your child cough until they are blue as they desperately struggle for air? Are you prepared for your grandchildren to be orphans when their parent dies from the heart damage that occured during a bout with childhood measles? I choose not get the HPV vaccine for moral reasons, nor have my kids or I ever had the flu vaccine. However, my husband's employer requires it and he gets one every year. Not all vaccines are created equal and that is a personal choice. But, if I had a child with asthma, we would get the flu vaccine every year. One thing I can assure with certainty is that there is no gigantic conspiracy amongst doctors and the government. Physicians have studied the science and they know the overwhelming evidence supports vaccinations. If you trust them about other personal medical issues, why the mistrust when it come to vaccines? Doctors and medicine are not perfect; there is inherent risk in every medical procedure, medication and vaccination. However, physicians do not take those risks lightly and never suggest those treatments where the risks far outweigh the rewards. Perhaps we should set aside the rhetoric and emotion, and be wise. When you have made your best decision, then be prepared to own the consequences whatever they may be.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

So What Can We Do?

I have spent a lot of time picking apart the liberal plan for reforming health care in the U.S. I do not have any confidence in a government that cannot run anything cheaply or efficiently. They are the last people I would trust to manage one sixth of our economy--I wouldn't trust them to do my lawn care. So, it's high time to talk about what can and should be done instead. Here are some ideas that would go a long way to lowering the cost of health care for everyone without a government takeover of health care. 1) Individual responsibility: As with anything in life, when we are directly responsible for the outcomes of our decisions, we are better for it, individually and as a society. That responsibility includes being accountable for our life choices, the amount of risks we take and paying our bills. It seems like a no-brainer doesn't it? Unfortunately, we have gotten away from that thinking in reference to our health care. If I choose to have multiple sexual partners, why...

Flawed Arguments and Stubborn Facts

My last post addressed some of the things we can do to improve health care without government involvement. I got a few comments, but wanted to address a couple in particular. These comments brought up issues that are worthy of response. One of the comments is as follows: " I would like to direct your attention to the writers first stated premise - there is no trust in the government with one sixth of our economy. My question is, how did it become one sixth of the economy? With every step of a 'free' enterprise system being everything but free, freedom is placed upon the back of those who are a dwindling base of contributors to support the greediness of astronomical proportions and the government is the recipient of easy target fingerpointing. If we insist on blaming government for a sick system, we are trying to fix the wrong problems." My initial reply was the following: "There are many causes of the problems in medical care which I have also written about on m...

National Lack of Integrity

According to dictionary.com the definition of integrity is: "adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty". Integrity in politics is becoming more scarce than ice cubes in hell. For example, a Huffington Post blog on why people really hate Hillary, was recently shared on Facebook. This blog post was one of the most egregious examples I have ever seen of felony intellectual fraud. The sum and substance of this blog excused everything St. Hillary the Martyr has ever done, or been accused of, because Trump is SO much worse. It then concluded that the real reason people hate her is because she's a woman. I'm not sure if I was more disturbed by the violent dry-heaving caused by this tripe or the fact that someone who I respect, who is smart and accomplished actually believes and shared it. If ever there were a more glaring example of the systemic loss of national integrity in the United States, it is the Presidential Election of 2016. ...