Skip to main content

The "Costs" of Medical Care by Thomas Sowell

This is by far one of my favorite authors and one of the smartest people I've ever read. He is an amazing man with an inspiring life story. (See http://www.tsowell.com/ for more information.) This article is a great perspective on the current healthcare debate.

The "Costs" of Medical Care

Now, with Dr. Sowell at my back, I'll venture to add the following:
It is worthwhile to discuss the difference between "cost" and "price". People often use the words interchangeably, but they are different things. Consumers are typically much more interested in the price than the cost. But businesses have to be interested in both the price they charge and their costs for producing. For example, when a grocery store sends out a weekly ad, they cover the front page with what they call "loss leaders". Loss leaders are the items that are put on sale at a loss in order to get customers in their stores. Grocery stores bank on the fact that customers will make other purchases in order to cover their costs of operating their business, but they actually lose money if you only buy those sale items. The price is what a consumer pays for any given product or service. The cost includes the manufacturing, shipping, training, equipment, wages, facilities, etc. for any given business. Any business that does not recoup their costs in the sale price is losing money. I'll give a simple example: Kinko's charges $.10 per self-serve, black and white copy. So, the price I would pay is $.10, but the actual cost of that copy is probably much lower, if I were only paying for the paper and the toner. Factored into the price I pay are the costs of the equipment, the facility charge, maintenance and repair, employees, etc.

So what?

When we talk about lowering the "cost" of health care, we have to be careful to understand the difference between cost and price. Government lackeys love to blather on about lowering the "costs" of healthcare. What they will succeed in doing for the short term is lowering the "price" that you and I pay. But the costs that hospitals, doctors, clinics, pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies bear to run their businesses will not change. The end result will be that we will then receive the level of quality for which we pay. If they succeed in lowering "costs", we will in the end, get what we are paying for. It is a brutal but simple fact and all the politicking in the world won't change that. Cause and effect, consequences, gravity are all dispassionate, unfeeling laws of nature. Supply and demand are not much different. Costs and prices are determined by the marketplace and all the well-meaning political tinkering can do nothing to eliminate that. They can only make it worse.

A perfect example of well-meaning tinkering is the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board. This board sets the prices statewide for milk, cream, cottage cheese, etc. I was paying over $4/gallon for milk when we lived in PA (less than a year ago) and it could never go on sale. Now I never pay more than $2/gallon. Oddly enough, I read about the same struggles for the dairy farmers in WA and PA. The government has "fixed" the price, but it is not helping the farmers and it is hurting the consumers. Where does the extra $2/gallon go? My guess would be to operate the Milk Marketing Board. I guess the good news is they're creating jobs......

Try as I may, I can see no good outcomes for the government getting involved in the costs of health care. Any price I pay will be too high.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

So What Can We Do?

I have spent a lot of time picking apart the liberal plan for reforming health care in the U.S. I do not have any confidence in a government that cannot run anything cheaply or efficiently. They are the last people I would trust to manage one sixth of our economy--I wouldn't trust them to do my lawn care. So, it's high time to talk about what can and should be done instead. Here are some ideas that would go a long way to lowering the cost of health care for everyone without a government takeover of health care. 1) Individual responsibility: As with anything in life, when we are directly responsible for the outcomes of our decisions, we are better for it, individually and as a society. That responsibility includes being accountable for our life choices, the amount of risks we take and paying our bills. It seems like a no-brainer doesn't it? Unfortunately, we have gotten away from that thinking in reference to our health care. If I choose to have multiple sexual partners, why...

Flawed Arguments and Stubborn Facts

My last post addressed some of the things we can do to improve health care without government involvement. I got a few comments, but wanted to address a couple in particular. These comments brought up issues that are worthy of response. One of the comments is as follows: " I would like to direct your attention to the writers first stated premise - there is no trust in the government with one sixth of our economy. My question is, how did it become one sixth of the economy? With every step of a 'free' enterprise system being everything but free, freedom is placed upon the back of those who are a dwindling base of contributors to support the greediness of astronomical proportions and the government is the recipient of easy target fingerpointing. If we insist on blaming government for a sick system, we are trying to fix the wrong problems." My initial reply was the following: "There are many causes of the problems in medical care which I have also written about on m...

National Lack of Integrity

According to dictionary.com the definition of integrity is: "adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty". Integrity in politics is becoming more scarce than ice cubes in hell. For example, a Huffington Post blog on why people really hate Hillary, was recently shared on Facebook. This blog post was one of the most egregious examples I have ever seen of felony intellectual fraud. The sum and substance of this blog excused everything St. Hillary the Martyr has ever done, or been accused of, because Trump is SO much worse. It then concluded that the real reason people hate her is because she's a woman. I'm not sure if I was more disturbed by the violent dry-heaving caused by this tripe or the fact that someone who I respect, who is smart and accomplished actually believes and shared it. If ever there were a more glaring example of the systemic loss of national integrity in the United States, it is the Presidential Election of 2016. ...